(Note: Clayton's is a non-alcoholic drink. The jingle had something about, 'the drink you have when not having a drink') so in Australia having a Clayton's is a term used to say you are having a substitute for the real thing).
Recently I read about Proust in Proust's Overcoat by Lorenza Foschini. Though it was about Proust, it was really about a Proust collector.
And then there is of course this:
Maybe he can, but I haven't really worked out how... Proust a philosopher?
And this, brilliant cover, but Proust a Neuroscientist?
Not to mention the book about Proust and the Squid?
All this Proust fan fiction really kindles my encouragement to read Proust, but every time I start, my eyes have to start again at that first page and get tangled in those sticky long sentences, my mind wanders and I start thinking of the past and wanting a madeleine.
So is reading Clayton's Proust better than the real thing?





3 comments:
Read Proust. Even just the first volume. Or 'On Reading' (my favourite). Or his first short stories, 'Pleasures and Day'.
I've found the fan stuff fairly ordinary, although de Waal is the exception. He is great on finding Swan in Charles Ephrussi.
Thanks Ruth - will look into it- something bite- able sounds good.
Yes, de Waal is clever pulling our thoughts between Proust's Swann and Charles Ephrussi - not sure where you are up to, but it is a very glittering family tree he has indeed....
I couldn't resist the de Waal. I've almost finished it, within a week.
Post a Comment